A second opinion on kundli matching

You were told no.

Was that one methodology’s answer — or all five?

Kundli matching is not one system. It is at least five, and they disagree with each other more often than they agree.

You were given one book's answer — and not told which book. That is what this report is for.

See what all five methodologies say — ₹99932 pages · within 12 hours · a call while we are smallOr read a complete sample report first — free, no email.
  • Fixed price
  • No remedies
  • Human reviewed
  • Privacy first

What actually happened

You did everything in the right order. It fell apart at the last step.

A couple sitting at a kitchen table, looking down at papers spread between them

You have been together for years. You told your parents. They came around. Somebody said let’s just get the kundlis checked — a formality, the last box before anyone talks about dates.

Then four minutes with two charts, and the word no.

And the part that is unbearable is not the no. It is that nobody will tell you what failed. You were given a number, or a Sanskrit word, and a verdict. No reasoning. No way to check. And the person who has to be convinced — usually a mother, usually with a twenty-year relationship with that astrologer — has already started to change her mind.

Her mum was fully on our side before this. But since yesterday, after the kundali reading, even she has changed.
one of 93 discussions we read in full while building this

This is for you if…

One honest note before you read on. We are not here to tell you the astrologer was wrong, and we are not here to talk anyone out of anything they believe. Sometimes all five methodologies agree with the answer you were given. When that happens we say so, plainly, on the first page.

Which situation brought you here?

We were told the match is badAnd you want a second opinion before anyone decides.Show me Two astrologers gave different answersConflicting advice has left you confused.Show me Our families follow different traditionsNorth versus South — two different methodologies.Show me We want clarity before involving everyoneUnderstand it fully before sharing with families.Show me

The thing nobody tells you

Kundli matching is not one system. It is at least five.

Different regions of India use different tables, different rule sets and different cut-offs. A family in Punjab and a family in Tamil Nadu are not doing the same arithmetic. They are reading different books — both centuries old, both entirely legitimate.

The North Indian methodology — Ashtakoota, literally the eight kootas — scores eight kootas, things being compared, out of 36 points. The Kerala methodology uses ten poruthams — its own ten compatibility tests — and weights them completely differently. B.V. Raman’s method and the Charak lineage disagree about how to judge Mars. The software most astrologers actually use merges two of these and tells you none of it.

So when you are given a verdict, you are not being told what “the shastras say”. You are being told what one book says — and you are not being told which book.

See what all five say about your two charts — ₹999

A score tells you what one methodology concluded.
It does not tell you how robust that conclusion is.

Three proofs follow. Every figure is computed across the whole comparison model, or measured on a simulated chart corpus — none of it is asserted.

Proof · one

The same person is manglik in one methodology and completely clean in another.

Mangal dosha — when Mars sits in certain houses — is the single most common reason a match is refused. Here is the share of charts flagged manglik, using the same charts, under each methodology’s own house set.

North Indian diamond chart, Mars in house 2123456789101112LAGNAमंMa

Manglik.

Mars sits in house 2 in this chart and does not move. All that changes is which houses the methodology counts.

Nobody made a mistake. The North Indian list omits the 2nd house. The South Indian list omits the 1st. They descend from two different verses in two different classical texts — and 61.4% of all charts fall in the gap between them.

Which means: if you were told you are manglik, there is a better-than-even chance that a different reading — equally traditional, equally citable — says you are not.

Find out which side of that gap you fall on — ₹999

Proof · two

The number you were given, in context.

You were told a score out of 36. You were probably not told what a normal score is. We computed it across all 11,664 ordered nakshatra-pada pairings — every combination of birth star and quarter the comparison model contains, not a sample. Every pairing is weighted equally: this is a uniform mathematical baseline, not a measured distribution of real couples.

0the average score of all pairings
0of all pairings reach 28 out of 36
0of all pairings reach 30 out of 36

If your family is holding out for 30 or more, they are waiting for something fewer than 3 in 100 pairings can produce. If you were told 20 and it sounded like failure — 20 is the exact average.

The doshas that end conversations are not rare either:

And how sure is it?

Sometimes five minutes matter.

A small difference in the recorded birth time can change a decision-relevant finding. Drag it and see. These bands are the sample couple’s — your own report states yours.

Verdict holds

The question is not only what score you were given. It is how robust that conclusion actually is — and whether anyone told you.

Proof · three

We ran all 11,664 pairings through all five methodologies. They disagree 56.4% of the time.

Not sometimes. Not in edge cases. More than half of the pairings get a different answer depending on which methodology is applied — and that is before Mars is even considered.

Each methodology on its own accepts a broadly similar share of pairings, between 61% and 68%. What differs is which pairings. The strictness lands on different people.

Which means your rejection may not be a fact about your charts. It may be a fact about which book was on the desk.

Same charts. Different rule sets.

The lower score is the one that accepts. The two methodologies are not measuring the same thing.

We are not telling you your astrologer was wrong.

He read your charts using one methodology, correctly. Very probably the one he was taught, by the teacher who taught him, in the region he learned in. That is how this knowledge has been passed down for centuries and there is nothing wrong with it.

What he did not do — because almost nobody does — is run the other four and show you where they part company.

That is not a criticism of him. It is the reason second opinions exist in medicine. A second opinion does not mean the first doctor was incompetent. It means two trained people looked at the same evidence, and you got to see both.

We send you the rule IDs and the citations. Take them to him. If he disagrees with our reading, we want to hear it — there is an address at the bottom of this page and a person reads it.

The five, named — with who says so and where it is followed.

Each one is a documented methodology profile: its own rule set, its own house set for Mangal dosha, and a named authority behind it. They are not independent of one another — they share the same astronomical inputs and some of the same texts — which is exactly why it matters where they part company.

MethodologyIts authorityWhere it is followed
North IndianThe Charak lineage, from K.S. Charak's Elements of Vedic AstrologyMost of North India
Drik PanchangThe methodology inside the most widely used matching software in IndiaThe de-facto default online
Astro-VisionThe SoulMate methodology, the dominant commercial engineUsed by many professional astrologers
South IndianB.V. Raman's Muhurtha — the most-cited modern authorityTamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra
KeralaPorutham-led, with Papasamyam weightingKerala

Every planetary position is computed against NASA JPL DE442 and agrees with it to 0.43 arc-seconds. Every cancellation rule we apply — all 93 — carries an ID and a citation you can check.

A worked example

A bride from Pune. A groom from Chennai. Three methodologies said no. Two said yes.

Her birth star is Ashwini, his is Purva Bhadrapada. They share the same nadi group — which is Nadi dosha, and costs all 8 of its points.

Here is what the five methodologies concluded about the same two charts:

Priya — North Indian diamond chart789101112123456LAGNAVeSuMeJuSaKeMoMaRa
Priya · Pune
Arjun — North Indian diamond chart891011121234567LAGNARaMoSaSuMeMaVeKeJu
Arjun · Chennai
MethodologyScoreVerdict
North Indian17 / 36Not recommended
Drik Panchang17 / 36Not recommended
Astro-Vision16.5 / 36Not recommended
South Indian13.5 / 36Acceptable
Kerala13.5 / 36Acceptable

Read that table again. The two methodologies that scored the match lowest are the two that accepted it.

Why the low scores accept

The South Indian and Kerala methodologies do not decide by the 36 points at all — they decide by the ten poruthams, and this couple passes seven of ten, which those methodologies class as madhyamam: middling, and acceptable. The 36-point score is almost incidental to them.

Mars, judged five ways

He is manglik in three of the five and clean in the other two — because South Indian, Drik Panchang and Kerala judge Mars from the Moon and Venus as well as the rising sign, and North Indian and Astro-Vision do not.

And one stranger still

The Vashya koota — which of the two holds sway over the other — scores 2 out of 2 in three methodologies and 0 out of 2 in the other two. Same charts. The difference is whether the methodology requires the compatibility to run both ways or only one.

What our engine printed for this couple

The two systems reach opposite conclusions. The South Indian schools accept it; the North Indian schools reject it. Ashtakoota scores 17/36 while the ten poruthams score 7/10. This is not a disagreement about a number — the two traditions are not measuring the same things. A cross-regional family will be told yes by one astrologer and no by another, and both will be right about their own system.

19 named rules are cited in that report. You can look up every one.

Run the same five on your two charts — ₹999

What is actually in the 32 pages

The printed report

The page that actually changes minds

“A note for the family” — printable on its own.

Here is the uncomfortable thing we found while researching this: the couple pays, but the couple does not decide. And a report the couple bought is usually dismissed as a report the couple bought.

So one page of the document is written for whoever does — a mother, a father, a grandmother, whoever this actually rests with in your family. Not for you. It is respectful, it cites named classical authorities, it uses the vocabulary their astrologer uses — and it does not argue with them. It sets out what each methodology concludes and leaves the judgement where it belongs.

It prints on its own, on one sheet, with no price and no website on it. In our experience that page is far easier to hand over than an argument.

Get the report, and the page for your family — ₹999

Read the entire thing before you pay a rupee.

Not a preview. Not the first two pages. All 32 pages of a real report — the Pune and Chennai case above, in full, with every table and every citation.

Every competitor in this category makes you pay before you see anything. We think that tells you something about what is inside.

Read the complete sample reportall 32 pages · no email required

Not deciding today?

Send yourself the sample and read it when the house is quiet. One email, the 32-page report attached, nothing after it.

One email. No list, no sequence, nothing after it. Or just open it here.

No list, no follow-up sequence, no sales email. We will write once, with the report. What we do with an address.

What happens if you do nothing

You get a sixth opinion. Then a seventh. Each one picks a book without telling you which, and each one hands back a verdict with no reasoning attached — so the answers pile up without ever adding up.

Some of them will be per-minute. The going rate in this category is ₹11 to ₹136 a minute, and a matching consultation runs twenty to forty minutes. Two of those cost more than this does, and you still have nothing written down to give your family.

And meanwhile a decision is being made about you, by people working from a number nobody explained.

This is not for you if…

How it works

  1. 01Tell us what you were told.The exact words, and who said them. This shapes the whole report, and no other service asks.
  2. 02Two sets of birth details.Date, time and place. If you do not know a birth time exactly, say so — we mark what is uncertain instead of guessing.
  3. 03Read it, then talk to us.Within twelve hours — and if it is late, the refund is automatic and you do not have to ask. Then twenty minutes on a call, included while we are small enough to offer it.

What this costs

Here is the market you are standing in.

A per-minute consultation₹11–136 a minutenothing written down
A software-generated report₹99–470a template with your numbers in it
A human-written report₹1,500–2,800one methodology, usually unnamed
This report₹999five methodologies, every rule named and cited

And here is what ₹999 gets you

  • A 32-page written report, five methodologies side by side
  • Every disagreement traced to a named rule and a cited text
  • Base rates — how common your result actually is
  • Birth-time sensitivity, stated rather than hidden
  • The printable page written for your family
  • A 20-minute call with the person who reviewed it, while we are small enough to offer it

₹999

One payment. UPI, GPay, PhonePe, Paytm or card. No subscription. No per-minute anything. Nothing else to buy.

Get my second opinion — ₹999Within 12 hours · late means an automatic refund

Secure payment · UPI · Cards · Net banking

What we guarantee

  • The computation is right. Planetary positions verified against NASA JPL DE442 to 0.43 arc-seconds. If we get your birth data wrong, or the engine errs, you get a full refund.
  • A person reads it before it is sent. Every report, permanently — not as a launch-week promise.
  • It arrives within twelve hours or you get a full refund.
  • If we cannot explain a disagreement, we hold the report and tell you why. If we still cannot resolve it, we refund you in full.
  • Your data is deleted whenever you ask within seven days, with an email to confirm.

You are paying for clarity, not for a yes.

There are three shapes an answer can take. All three are valid outcomes, and you are paying us to tell you which one is true for your charts.

ContestedThe methodologies materially disagree.

We show you exactly where, and which rule caused it.

Broad consensusMost point the same direction.

There may be minor differences, but the direction is clear.

UnanimousAll five evaluated methodologies agree.

Complete agreement across all five — favourable or not.

Check our work.

From a planet's position to a sentence in your report — every step is visible and documented.

  1. 1Astronomical positions

    Computed for your exact birth details and verified against NASA JPL DE442 to 0.43 arc-seconds.

  2. 2Documented methodology

    Five documented methodologies, each applied with its own rules — house sets, koota tables and cancellations — computed on one astronomical convention (Lahiri).

  3. 3A named rule

    Every conclusion is tied to a specific rule with an ID and a citation.

  4. 4The conclusion

    We show how that rule applies to your charts, and what it does and does not mean.

Transparency at every step — so you can verify, not just believe.

Your birth details are personal.
Read the privacy page

We have no testimonials yet. Here is what we have instead.

This is a new business. We could fill this space with five-star quotes and a number of families helped, and you would have no way to check any of it — which is exactly the behaviour that made a second opinion necessary in the first place.

So instead:

The complete sample report is published.

All 32 pages, before you pay.

The method is published.

Which methodologies, whose books, which tables.

Every rule carries an ID and a citation.

Take them to your own astrologer.

We hold reports back

when our engine flags something it cannot explain, and refund in full if we cannot resolve it.

One person answers the email

not a support queue, and not a bot.

When there are real customers, their words will go here. Not before.

Questions people ask

Will this change my parents’ minds?

Sometimes. It depends on whether the methodologies genuinely disagree about your match — across the comparison model they disagree for a little over half of all pairings. The report includes a page written for the person who has to decide, citing named classical authorities, which does not argue with your astrologer. That has proved easier to hand over than an argument. We cannot promise more than that.

You were given a verdict. You were not given the reasoning.

Five methodologies. Every disagreement named and cited. A page your family can read. One fixed price.

Start with what you were told — ₹99932 pages · within 12 hours · a call while we are small

Still deciding? Read all 32 pages of a real report first.

P.S. — If you take one thing from this page, take this: the number you were given is not a fact about your marriage. It is the output of one particular book.

P.P.S. — If all five methodologies do agree with the answer you were given, we will tell you that too, on page one, without softening it. That is the only thing that makes the other outcome worth anything.